Skip to Main Content

Curriculum

Supreme Court Document-Based Questions

Essential Question

How can you help your students develop critical thinking skills? Explore Landmark Supreme Court cases that changed history. Give your students tools to evaluate the Court's rulings and their impact on American society. Analyze primary sources spanning five centuries--colonial codes of law, the Federalist Papers, the Constitution, contemporary photographs, case law, oral arguments, the Court's majority and dissenting opinions, and others. Each Document Based Question (DBQ) will lead them towards an understanding of the role played by the Court and an assessment of its decisions. Each DBQ also contains a section called "The Issue Endures," which highlights current applications of the case issue.

Published
Apr 11, 2014

 

Units

Load more units

Curriculum resources

Close-up of marble columns with fluted design and solid bases, highlighting architectural details.
LessonMarbury v. Madison (1803)

Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of Marbury v. Madison. Setting the precedent of Judicial review, this lesson focuses on the question of whether or not the Supreme Court should have the power to overturn unconstitutional federal laws.

U.S. Supreme Court building with an American flag waving in front and the words "Equal Justice" inscribed above.
LessonDred Scott v. Sanford (1857)

Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. Sanford. This case deals with the issues of slavery, states’ rights, and the interpretation of our Founding documents. This lesson focuses on the question of how the two sides in the Dred Scott decision interpreted the same Founding documents and came to such different conclusions.

Columns and stone facade of a building with the inscription "COURT HOUSE" above.
LessonUnited States v. Nixon (1974)

Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of United States v. Nixon. Dealing with the principle of separation of powers, this lesson focuses on the question of whether or not the Constitution’s separation of powers intended to create an absolute executive privilege.

The United States Supreme Court building with columns and statues under a blue sky.
LessonPlessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Case background and primary documents concerning Plessy v. Ferguson. Dealing with the principle of Equal Protection, this lesson asks students to evaluate the degree to which custom, precedent, and understanding of federalism informed the ruling in the case.

The U.S. Supreme Court building featuring columns and a statue on its steps under a blue sky.
LessonBrown v. Board of Education (1954)

Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education. Dealing with the principle of Equal Protection, this lesson asks students to assess the role played by the Court as the protector of individual rights against the tyranny of the majority.

Statue of a seated figure in front of a neoclassical building with columns, inscribed with "Equal Justice Under Law."
LessonRegents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)

Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. Dealing with the principle of Equal Protection and affirmative action, this lesson asks students to asses whether or not the  University of California at Davis's special admissions program resulted in unconstitutional reverse discrimination.

The United States Supreme Court building with an American flag in front, featuring the inscription "Equal Justice Under Law."
LessonGratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)

Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. Dealing with the principle of equal protection and affirmative action, this lesson asks students to evaluate the Court's reasoning in upholding Grutter while striking down Gratz.

The front exterior of a large, neoclassical courthouse with columns and steps under a blue sky.
LessonMapp v. Ohio (1961)

Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of Mapp v. Ohio. Dealing with incorporation of the Fourth Amendment and the legality of searches and seizures, this lesson asks students to assess the claim that the exclusionary rule helps ensure liberty and justice.

Columns and stone facade of a building with the inscription "COURT HOUSE" above.
LessonGideon v. Wainwright (1963)

Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of Gideon v. Wainwright. Dealing with whether or not a state must provide a lawyer to the accused, this lesson asks students whether or not they believe the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to counsel in all cases and whether the government must provide a lawyer to defendants who want one but cannot afford one.

The facade of a neoclassical building with sculptures and the inscription "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW."
LessonMiranda v. Arizona (1966)

Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of Miranda v. Arizona. Dealing with the Fifth and Sixth Amendments and whether or not the accused needs to be advised of their rights upon arrest, this lesson asks students to evaluate the extent to which Miranda is the fulfillment of the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination.

U.S. Supreme Court building with American flag and cloudy blue sky.
LessonTinker v. Des Moines (1969)

Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of Tinker v. Des Moines. Dealing with students rights and the First Amendment's protection of free speech, this lesson asks students to evaluate the extent to which the First Amendment should protect symbolic speech, and the degree to which that protection should be guaranteed to students in public schools.

LessonHazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988)

Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier. Dealing with the extent of students' First Amendment rights, this lesson asks students to argue whether or not the First Amendment should protect student speech in public school-sponsored newspapers.

Load more

Standards