Skip to Main Content

Unit

Equal Protection and Affirmative Action Supreme Court Cases

Published
Nov 6, 2020
The U.S. Supreme Court building featuring columns and a statue on its steps under a blue sky.

Lessons

The United States Supreme Court building with columns and statues under a blue sky.
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
  • 4 Activities

Case background and primary documents concerning Plessy v. Ferguson. Dealing with the principle of Equal Protection, this lesson asks students to evaluate the degree to which custom, precedent, and understanding of federalism informed the ruling in the case.

The U.S. Supreme Court building featuring columns and a statue on its steps under a blue sky.
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
  • 4 Activities

Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education. Dealing with the principle of Equal Protection, this lesson asks students to assess the role played by the Court as the protector of individual rights against the tyranny of the majority.

Statue of a seated figure in front of a neoclassical building with columns, inscribed with "Equal Justice Under Law."
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)
  • 4 Activities

Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. Dealing with the principle of Equal Protection and affirmative action, this lesson asks students to asses whether or not the  University of California at Davis's special admissions program resulted in unconstitutional reverse discrimination.

The United States Supreme Court building with an American flag in front, featuring the inscription "Equal Justice Under Law."
Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)
  • 4 Activities

Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. Dealing with the principle of equal protection and affirmative action, this lesson asks students to evaluate the Court's reasoning in upholding Grutter while striking down Gratz.

Standards