Skip to Main Content
Image featuring "Miranda v. Arizona" title and "BRI's Homework Help Series" with the Bill of Rights Institute logo.
The facade of a neoclassical building with sculptures and the inscription "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW."
Text document titled "Rights of the Accused" by Dennis Goldford, discussing government authority and legal protections.
Text document discussing the case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) with case background and directions for analysis.

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Miranda v Arizona

6 items

Image featuring "Miranda v. Arizona" title and "BRI's Homework Help Series" with the Bill of Rights Institute logo.
Miranda v. Arizona | BRI’s Homework Help Series
Video

Video

3 Min

Miranda v. Arizona was a case brought to the Supreme Court in 1966 after Ernesto Miranda appealed his guilty conviction of kidnapping and rape. In his appeal, Miranda claimed he was unaware of his right to remain silent and his resulting confession should not be used to incriminate him. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Miranda and established the Miranda Warning. This warning is now recited in most instances of arrest to ensure the accused people are aware of their rights.
3 Min
The facade of a neoclassical building with sculptures and the inscription "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW."
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Lesson - 4 Activities

Lesson

4 Activities

Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of Miranda v. Arizona. Dealing with the Fifth and Sixth Amendments and whether or not the accused needs to be advised of their rights upon arrest, this lesson asks students to evaluate the extent to which Miranda is the fulfillment of the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination.