- How did President James Buchanan’s response to the US Supreme Court’s decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) contrast with the United States’s highest principles?
- Trace the events surrounding the Dred Scott decision.
- Examine President Buchanan’s statements regarding the Dred Scott decision and the spread of slavery.
- Assess contemporary reactions to the Dred Scott decision expressed in newspaper editorials.
- Evaluate various statements regarding the institution of slavery, considering to what extent those statements reflect our nation’s highest principles.
- Handout A: James Buchanan and the Dred Scott Decision
- Handout B: Editorial Analysis of the Dred Scott Decision
- Handout C: Slavery and American Ideals
To create a context for this lesson, have students complete Constitutional Connection: Slavery and the Constitution.
Have students read Handout A: James Buchanan and the Dred Scott Decision and answer the questions.
As a large group, go over the questions to Handout A.
- How would you assess Buchanan’s response to the Dred Scott decision, and his hope that the ruling would settle the controversy over the spread of slavery?
- Ask students to brainstorm what America’s highest principles are. Did Buchanan’s response to the ruling reflect or contradict those principles?
ACTIVITY I [20 MINUTES]
Cut out and give eight students one slip each from Handout B: Editorial Analysis of the Dred Scott Decision.
Tell students they will now hear some quotes from editorials that ran in newspapers in 1857. Call on one student to read the quotation from his or her slip. The student should NOT reveal the information about the newspaper.
Ask the class whether the editorial supports the ruling or condemns it, and clarify any questions.
Next, ask students to assess whether the editorial ran in a Northern or Southern newspaper. Have the student inform the class as to the correct answer with the information on the slip. Designate a side of the room for “Northern” and “Southern” and have the student move to the correct side.
Repeat the process for the remaining students/editorials.
Once all have been completed, have the students with editorials give either a “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” to show their position on the ruling. What patterns are revealed?
Ask students what important constitutional principles are highlighted in the editorials. How do the editorial writers refer to concepts such as liberty, federalism, and equality? Editorials that oppose the Dred Scott decision point to such principles as the Founders’ ideals of liberty and equality. Those that support the Dred Scott decision reflect the Constitution’s guarantees of such principles as property rights and states’ powers. Students may say that property rights should never apply to “property” in people.
ACTIVITY II [25 MINUTES]
Distribute or put up an overhead of Handout C: Slavery and American Ideals. Students should follow directions on the Handout.
When students have finished, asked:
- Which (if any) of these quotes is a good articulation of our nation’s highest principles.
- What other quotes explain our highest principles?
- How did President James Buchanan’s response to the Dred Scott decision demonstrate or fail to demonstrate those principles?
- What do you think his response should have been?
Have students write a one-page paper explaining what America’s highest principles are and in what ways James Buchanan’s reaction to the Dred Scott decision demonstrated or failed to demonstrate those principles.
Dred Scott v. Sandford | Homework Help from the Bill of Rights Institute
The Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857 was brought to the Supreme Court just four years before the start of the Civil War. Dred Scott sued his master for his freedom and Judge Robert Taney ultimately ruled two things. First, African Americans were not citizens and had no right to sue in court. Second, Congress did not have the constitutional authority to ban slavery from the states. This case is considered one of the worst rulings in the history of the Supreme Court.
Dred Scott v. Sandford DBQ
Use this Lesson to help students understand the attempts made to resolve the issue of slavery in the territories.
Roger Taney and Injustice: The Dred Scott Decision
Students will explore the vice of injustice in this lesson on civic virtue. Students will examine Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger Taney and the Dred Scott (1857) decision that instituted great injustice against African Americans by arguing that they cannot be citizens. This lesson contains a historical narrative, discussion guide, primary sources related to the majority decision and dissents in the Supreme Court case, and activities that guide students through analyzing the effect of injustice on constitutional principles and civil society.
Constitution of the United States of America (1787)
The Constitution was written in the summer of 1787 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, by delegates from 12 states, in order to replace the Articles of Confederation with a new form of government. It created a federal system with a national government composed of 3 separated powers, and included both reserved and concurrent powers of states.