Written by: Gregory L. Schneider, Emporia State University
By the end of this section, you will:
- Explain the various military and diplomatic responses to international developments over time
- Explain how and why policies related to the environment developed and changed from 1968 to 1980
Use this Narrative in the first half of the chapter to discuss the impact the 1973 oil crisis had on the economy and how it affected the growing environmental movement.
After an invasion by three Arab states in the Six Day War in 1967, Israel acquired the Sinai Peninsula from Egypt, the West Bank from Jordan, and the Golan Heights from Syria. Six years later, on October 6, 1973, Anwar Sadat of Egypt and Hafez al-Assad of Syria caught Israel by surprise with a massive attack on both its southern and northern borders. The Yom Kippur War that followed was so named because it began on the High Holy Day of the Jewish faith.
The Nixon administration decided to come to Israel’s rescue and resupplied its army with weapons. Because of the Cold War and their friendships with Middle Eastern nations, the Soviets countered, supplying both Syria and Egypt with weapons. This led to fears on both sides of a major war between the superpowers as Nixon raised the defense condition (DefCon) level to 4 (on a scale from 5 to 1, which was war) during the conflict. After three weeks of fighting, a United Nations -brokered resolution ended the conflict, with Israel remaining in control of territories it had gained in the 1967 war.
While the fighting was still going on, on October 17, 1973, Saudi Arabia and the members of Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) wanted to punish the supporters of Israel by announcing a 5 percent cut in oil output. President Nixon and Congress responded by providing an additional $2.2 billion to the Israelis. That led to a Saudi decision, backed by OPEC, to go further and place an embargo on oil shipments to the United States and Western European countries, a decision that caused the first oil crisis of the 1970s.
Five nations – Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela – had formed the OPEC cartel in 1960. With an additional seven nations joining by 1973, OPEC countries’ production accounted for half the oil produced in the world. OPEC had powerful leverage in setting production output and in establishing a benchmark price for crude oil in the world. It was willing to use this leverage politically in a number of crises in the 1970s.
Through World War II, the United States had been the biggest producer of oil in the world (a status it regained in 2018). Oil fields in Texas, Oklahoma, other states, and the Gulf of Mexico produced enough oil to maintain the cheap gasoline Americans enjoyed in the 1950s and 1960s. By 1973, U.S. consumption of oil was also the highest in the world; with only 6 percent of the world’s population, the United States consumed one-third of the oil produced. Moreover, with tremendous industrial growth and the expansion of highways and automobile production, oil imports were increasingly necessary to sustain America’s economic expansion and growth. By the early 1970s, imports accounted for about 30 percent of the oil consumed in the United States, which had begun to curtail domestic production and exploration due to environmental concerns and governmental regulations.
The OPEC embargo showcased the new power of the cartel in the world economy and struck many Americans as another example of their nation’s decline in the 1970s. When the embargo took hold, oil prices jumped from $2 per barrel to $11. The impact hit American consumers in their wallets as retail prices for gasoline soared by 40 percent in November 1973 alone. Fearful of shortages of gasoline, Americans lined up at the pump to refuel while gas stations raised their prices several times per day. The gas lines exposed the panic that set in during the embargo as motorists worried that if they did not fill up today, then the price might be higher tomorrow. Not surprisingly, with demand high, many stations ran out of fuel, and signs saying “Sorry, No Gas Today” became quite common in the late fall months.
Nixon was diverted from the problem by the Watergate scandal. On October 20, 1973, he had fired the special prosecutor in the Watergate investigation, Archibald Cox, and found himself embattled because of his own cover-up of the Republican break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate Hotel in June 1972. The Western European countries and Japan, key allies of the United States, faced much more difficult problems with the embargo, because they relied on the OPEC states for 45 to 50 percent of their oil.
However, a break in the oil crisis came in January 1974 when National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger met with King Faisal of Saudi Arabia and persuaded him that the conditions for the embargo had ended with the end of the Yom Kippur war. More importantly, Egypt’s Sadat realized that the embargo was hurting his country’s image. After Kissinger negotiated the terms for reconciliation and helped end the embargo, Nixon visited Israel, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia in May 1974 and gained a massive outpouring of support from the Egyptian people, who welcomed the U.S. president, the first ever to visit Egypt. Three months later, Nixon resigned the presidency.
Beyond the oil crisis, rising energy costs were only one manifestation of the great inflation that ripped through the economies of the West during the 1970s. Prices rose for several reasons: expansion of government spending on social programs and the war in Vietnam; low interest rates established by the Federal Reserve Board, which encouraged more borrowing by businesses; rising energy costs; and, in 1971, the end of the Bretton Woods monetary system linking the value of the U.S. dollar to the value of gold. The result was skyrocketing consumer prices that outpaced wage increases for workers. Nixon responded by applying artificial wage and price controls to the economy in 1971. They began to produce shortages until, when they were lifted after 90 days, prices skyrocketed again.
President Gerald Ford, lacking any better solutions, used psychology to get control of inflation, asking citizens to wear Whip Inflation Now (WIN) buttons. President Jimmy Carter reined in government spending by reducing its growth and began deregulating industry, but kept price controls on oil. Carter also appointed Paul Volcker, an anti-inflation hawk, as chair of the Federal Reserve Board in 1978, and his policy of driving up interest rates ended the great inflation by 1983 (but the result was a recession in 1979-1980 and again in 1981-1982). Clearly, more than just high oil prices was responsible for the inflation of the 1970s. As economist Milton Friedman wrote in his 1979 book Free to Choose: “There is one simple way to end the energy crisis and the gasoline shortages tomorrow. Eliminate all the controls on the prices of crude oil and other petroleum products.”
Americans faced a second, more severe shock at the pump after Iran cut oil exports entirely from December 1978 until the autumn of 1979, during the consolidation of power by the new Iranian Islamic government under Ayatollah Khomeini. Other nations, like Saudi Arabia, picked up the slack, but the result was a second major panic that tripled the price of gasoline at the pump (to more than $1.00 per gallon, which, adjusted for inflation, was the highest gas price U.S. consumers had ever paid). The price per barrel more than doubled from $15 per barrel to $39 per barrel by mid-1979. Again, panic ensued as drivers lined up for gas and shortages resulted.
The 1979 Three Mile Island nuclear accident in Pennsylvania that resulted in a partial nuclear meltdown turned the public against nuclear power and triggered additional fears of skyrocketing energy costs. The price of home heating oil doubled in the harsh winters of 1979 and 1980. Most importantly, the oil crunch fueled a new round of inflation because railroads and airlines were hit hard by the fuel crisis and raised fares in response. Jimmy Carter spoke to this topic in his 1979 “malaise speech,” calling the oil crisis “the moral equivalent of war,” yet he chose not to ease up on regulations on oil production in the United States to expand supply and lower prices to meet the crisis.
That regulatory policy took effect after the election of Ronald Reagan. Reagan wanted to steer the country toward greater energy independence. In part because of the Reagan administration’s success in persuading Saudi Arabia to keep production up despite a drop in demand (to limit the oil profits the Soviet Union was using to fund its military), the price of oil plummeted during the 1980s and 1990s, from $20 per barrel to $5 by the end of the 1980s.
The oil shocks of the 1970s had a profound impact on the American economy and politics. They signified the beginnings of an effort to examine renewable energy sources, like solar and wind energy. Eventually, ethanol production from corn also was subsidized by the federal government in an attempt to produce alternatives to oil in the refining of gasoline. Auto producers began to build smaller, more fuel-efficient cars. (However, when oil prices dropped, American consumers turned back to fuel-hungry trucks and sport utility vehicles). Domestic energy sources and producers received new encouragement from the Reagan administration, and by the mid-2000s, the development of fracking, the use of high-pressure sand and water to unlock oil stored in shale rock, led to the development of the Bakken Oil Field in North Dakota and the Permian Basin in Texas. With this development, by 2018, the United States was once again the largest oil producer in the world.
Politically, the deregulation of oil contributed to the conservative revolution in American politics. Carter lost his reelection bid due to the country’s economic troubles and the Iran hostage crisis, while oil-friendly Republican administrations, including those of Reagan, George W. Bush, and Donald Trump, encouraged greater American production and exploration. Yet the oil market remains volatile, and although the Middle Eastern nations comparatively produce less oil than in the 1970s, geopolitics and the demand for energy will likely make oil a key part of world politics for the foreseeable future.
1. Why did the Yom Kippur War produce the first oil embargo in 1973?
- President Nixon supported Israel.
- The Soviet Union ordered OPEC to embargo oil.
- The price of oil declined because of the war.
- Saudi Arabia needed the hard currency.
2. The 1979 oil crisis was sparked by
- President Carter’s curtailing of domestic oil production
- OPEC’s embargo of oil
- Iran’s cut of oil exports
- the war between Israel and the Arab States
3. A major concern the Yom Kippur War raised for the United States was
- an economic depression in the United States
- an ensuing war between the world’s superpowers
- fear that the United States would no longer be the world’s biggest oil producer
- the annihilation of the state of Israel
4. For the United States, the most significant impact of the 1973 oil embargo was
- the need to increase domestic oil production
- a loss of economic support from important allies
- a 40 percent increase in gas prices
- the end of its alliance with Israel
5. All the following were major impacts of the oil shocks of the 1970s except
- America began to examine the use of renewable energy sources
- the federal government subsidized alternative forms of automobile fuel
- automobile companies began to build smaller cars
- Richard Nixon was reelected in a landslide victory
6. The domestic event that made oil shocks more problematic in the 1970s was
- the Watergate scandal
- the Three Mile Island incident
- the end of the Bretton Woods monetary system
- the introduction of ethanol production
7. Which of the following is an accurate comparison of the 1973 and 1979 oil crises?
- Both crises led to a renewed interest in examining renewable energy sources.
- The 1973 crisis resulted from cuts in domestic oil production, whereas the 1979 crisis was the result of the Yom Kippur War.
- The 1973 crisis was more severe than the crisis of 1979.
- Both crises led to reduced regulations to expand domestic oil production.
Free Response Questions
- Explain how the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) was successful in its oil embargo in 1973.
- Analyze the impact of price controls on the 1970s oil crisis in the United States.
AP Practice QuestionsRefer to the image provided.
1. Events like those in the photograph were most directly related to
- stagflation of the 1970s
- the oil embargos of the 1970s
- recessions of the 1970s
- the Whip Inflation Now campaign
2. Which event contributed most to events such as those depicted in the photograph?
- The Yom Kippur War
- The Watergate scandal
- The Islamic Revolution in Iran
- Increased government spending on social programs
3. A significant federal reaction to the economic crisis that accompanied the event in the photograph was
- President Nixon’s trip to the Middle East to negotiate lower oil prices
- temporary wage and price controls
- the use of the Whip Inflation Now campaign to improve the economy
- the appointment of Paul Volcker as Federal Reserve chair
Richard Nixon, Address to the Nation about National Energy Policy, November 1973. https://www.nixonlibrary.gov/sites/default/files/2018-08/energycrisisspeech_transcript.pdf
Jimmy Carter, “A Crisis of Confidence” speech, July 1979. https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/jimmycartercrisisofconfidence.htm
Ronald Reagan, Radio Address to the Nation on Oil Prices, April 1986. https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/research/speeches/41986a
Jacobs, Meg. Panic at the Pump: The Energy Crisis and the Transformation of American Politics in the 1970s. New York: Hill and Wang, 2017.
Samuelson, Robert J. The Great Inflation and its Aftermath: The Past and Future of American Affluence. New York: Random House, 2011.
Yergin, Daniel. The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Profit. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1991.
Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness
In our resource history is presented through a series of narratives, primary sources, and point-counterpoint debates that invites students to participate in the ongoing conversation about the American experiment.