Written by: Kenneth J. Heineman, Angelo State University
By the end of this section, you will:
- Explain how and why opposition to existing policies and values developed and changed over the course of the 20th century
Use this Narrative after students have read the Chapter 15 Introductory Essay: 1968-1980 to discuss the continuation of anti-war sentiments toward the conflict in Vietnam and its effect on Americans at home.
On May 4, 1970, many Americans were horrified when troops from the Ohio National Guard shot student demonstrators at Kent State University, a regional public college located in the town of Kent, Ohio. By 1970, during continued protests against the Vietnam War, people expected to see violent clashes at the University of California, Berkeley (UC Berkeley), but not on a Midwestern campus.
In the mid-1950s, Kent State had been a teachers’ college with an enrollment of 5,000 students. Ten years later, the college was conducting Defense Department research and enrollment had grown to 21,000 students. Two developments transformed Kent State from a backwater to an outpost of the 1960s counterculture. First, the construction of the Ohio Turnpike and related highway improvements in the 1950s eased the commute between Kent and Cleveland, a distance of 39 miles. Kent also became a way station for travelers between New York and Chicago. Second, the university’s enrollment growth created a pool of young people looking for entertainment. Illegal drugs flowed and musicians were drawn to Kent’s multiplying bars. The Eagles’ Joe Walsh worked on his music at the university and in the town’s taverns. The future members of the band Devo were Kent State students. They were also active in the campus chapter of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS).
Residents liked the money students spent but did not approve of their behavior. Kent State president Robert White shared the concerns of the townspeople. Although he sought more students to enroll, he thought the radical elements were “human debris” who he believed had no business being in college. In fact, state law required that public universities admit all Ohio high school graduates regardless of their grade-point averages.
The student body at Kent State was generally middle-class and apolitical. There was, however, a minority whose members did not fit that mold. Such students were the product of a peculiar history. During the Great Depression, eastern Ohio had been a battlefield between union organizers and corporate leaders. In 1937, during the national steel strike, police and the Ohio Guard had beaten and shot union supporters (Figure 15.16). Gus Hall, a union organizer and Communist Party member, dynamited the homes of workers who refused to go on strike. Meanwhile, union organizers and corporate security forces cruised Cleveland, engaging in gun fights.
After World War II, these union organizers and former communists settled down and started families. Their baby boom children, if they went to college, often chose Kent State. The university was far enough from home to create the space young people wanted from their parents but close enough for comfort when needed. Many of the Kent State anti-war activists came from union households, and some were “red diaper babies,” whose parents had been members of the Communist Party during the 1940s and 1950s, from Cleveland.
Though it received no national notice, a handful of Kent State students launched a Free Speech Movement a year before the widely reported protests at UC Berkeley erupted. In the fall of 1964, 25 Kent State students decided to protest a war that was still several months from escalating. The Kent Committee to End the War in Vietnam engaged in peaceful picketing. In response, hostile students shot pellet guns at the anti-war students and assaulted them. The university administration ignored the anti-war students’ complaints.
By 1968, thousands of college students around the country had become radicalized in response to the widening war in Vietnam. New SDS recruits tended to be more militant than those of just a few years earlier. Kent State’s population was no exception. The Kent State SDS chapter, established in 1968, considered earlier campus anti-war activists too restrained in the face of verbal and physical attack. With 250 members, Kent State’s SDS flexed its muscles. Radicals intended to drive corporate recruiters from campus, abolish their school’s Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC), end military-related university research, and prevent speakers whose views they disagreed with from lecturing.
Demonstrating that they were the intellectual heirs of influential radical Marxist philosopher Herbert Marcuse, Kent State activists traveled to the University of Akron in 1968, where they disrupted a speech by Republican presidential nominee Richard Nixon and shouted obscenities at him. Time magazine described the action as the “most successful disruption of a Nixon speech during the campaign.”
The Kent State SDS’s militancy attracted the notice of SDS organizers at more elite campuses. By 1969, when SDS splintered, dozens of Kent State students had already become part of theWeathermennetwork, which was a radical leftist student organization founded at the University of Michigan by a faction of SDS that used bombings and violence to achieve its objectives. To Weathermen Jim Mellen and Terry Robbins, Kent offered a place to stay when driving between New York and Chicago, was close to a support network in Cleveland, had a vibrant counterculture, and possessed a seemingly fearless activist student group.
Kent State’s SDS leaders forged an alliance with the campus chapter of the Black United Students (BUS). Both BUS and SDS blocked police department recruiters from Oakland, California, from meeting with students. BUS followed up by staging a walkout of nearly all African American students from campus. In response, the college’s President Robert L. White denounced BUS and SDS for intimidating students. Although initially grateful for SDS’s support, BUS leaders now concluded that the white radicals were using them as shields to hide behind. They were also concerned that SDS did not understand that assaulting police officers invited a wholesale beating of everyone, including BUS members. BUS then broke off relations with the Kent SDS.
In 1969, after the expulsion and arrest of Kent State’s SDS leaders on charges ranging from trespassing to assault, the radicals’ rhetoric became even more confrontational. In the spring of 1969, Jim Mellen, who had decamped from the University of Michigan, stood on top of an overturned trash can and laid out the SDS worldview:
I know that there are some pigs out there who still think we should occupy Vietnam. And there are some pigs out there who still think they can go into ghettoes and push people around. Well, what we’re telling you is that you can’t do it anymore! We are no longer asking you to come and help us make a revolution. We’re telling you that the revolution has begun, and the only choice you have to make is which side you’re on. And we’re also telling you that if you get in the way of that revolution, it’s going to run right over you.
Kent’s President White shut down the Kent State SDS chapter, arguing that the radicals had a “disregard for the rights of others” and offered only a “program of revolution solely for revolution’s sake.” He also denounced the “bleeding hearts” who made excuses for student violence. White was especially angered by his own liberal arts professors, who had helped SDS members occupying a campus building to evade arrest. He himself had stood by at first and then surrounded the building with Ohio Highway Patrol troopers to prevent the activists from escaping. Thanks to faculty assistance, however, the SDSers were able to flee through an exit the Highway Patrol had overlooked.
After the spring 1969 events at Kent State, the campus appeared to have settled down. There were rumors of Weathermen comings and goings, but no reported incidents of violence. The Weathermen had attempted to kill a Cleveland police officer with a car bomb but failed.
On April 30, 1970, President Nixon announced he had sent troops into Cambodia to intercept North Vietnamese supplies destined for South Vietnam. This action escalated the war he had promised to end, which upset the anti-war students. College students, who had believed they were safe from the draft if their lottery number was high enough, now feared an escalation of combat. Campus demonstrations erupted nationally, some peaceful, others violent.
The next day, May 1, a bar fight among students moved into the streets. Soon, rioters were breaking store windows. Kent’s political leadership requested that the Republican governor of Ohio, James Rhodes, send National Guard troops. On May 2, a riot broke out on campus and unidentified people set fire to the ROTC building. While the fire raged, the Ohio Guard arrived (Figure 15.17). Governor Rhodes came to Kent on May 3 and announced that he planned to “eradicate” the “communist element.”
Many of the Ohio Guard troops were regular Army veterans with little patience for student protesters. Some had been patrolling the highways huntingTeamstersnipers who had been shooting at nonunion truckers. Looking at the angry and jittery troops, nearly all the black students fled, fearful they would be shot. Some of the working-class white student activists shared that concern but remained. Most middle-class students argued that the troops did not have loaded guns.
On May 4, after facing the jeers of 2,000 protestors and being on the receiving end of thrown rocks, a few Guardsmen opened fire. Thirteen students were hit, four fatally.
Across the nation four million students participated in protest activities after the Kent State shootings. Shaken by the wave of protests, Nixon withdrew U.S. troops from Cambodia. The rock band Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young quickly released a protest song “Ohio” about the Kent State activities and shootings. Despite the massive student reaction against the shootings, however, campus protest evaporated. Moreover, public opinion came down on the side of the forces of law and order. Nixon won a landslide reelection in 1972, and Ohio governor James Rhodes served an additional two terms.
1. During most of the Vietnam War period, the general student population of Kent State University was considered
- more radical than most
- largely middle-class and apolitical
- unusually outspoken on social issues
- among the last all-white groups at a public university
2. The Ohio governor who sent the State National Guard onto the Kent State campus was
- Richard Nixon
- Jim Mellen
- Robert White
- James Rhodes
3. Radical elements of the 1960s protest movement present on the Kent State University campus at some point during the decade included all the following except the
- Students for a Democratic Society
- Communist Party USA
- Black United Students
- Free Speech Movement
4. Which group was banned by the president of Kent State University because he claimed it was made up of radicals who had a “disregard for the rights of others” and offered only a “program of revolution solely for revolution’s sake”?
- Students for a Democratic Society
- Black United Students
- The National Guard
- Communist Party USA
5. By 1970, the main reason for student unrest on the campus of Kent State University was
- the presence of the Ohio National Guard
- the election of Richard Nixon as president
- the perceived escalation of the Vietnam War
- social injustice in American society
6. Some student protestors of the 1960s used violent strategies most similar to those of which group?
- Women agitating for the right to vote in the 1910s
- Labor union leaders from the 1880s
- Abolitionists in the 1840s
- Civil Rights protesters in the 1950s
Free Response Questions
- Describe what led up to the events of May 4, 1970, on the campus of Kent State University.
- To what extent did the Kent State shootings alter public opinion?
AP Practice Questions
“Those who came before us made certain that this country rode the first waves of the industrial revolutions, the first waves of modern invention, and the first wave of nuclear power, and this generation does not intend to founder in the backwash of the coming age of space. We mean to be a part of it- we mean to lead it. For the eyes of the world now look into space, to the moon and to the planets beyond, and we have vowed that we shall not see it governed by a hostile flag of conquest, but by a banner of freedom and peace. We have vowed that we shall not see space filled with weapons of mass destruction, but with instruments of knowledge and understanding.”
John F. Kennedy, Rice Stadium Moon Speech, September 12, 1962
Refer to the excerpt provided.
- Unresolved issues of World War II
- Nuclear proliferation
- The increase in tension in Vietnam
- The Cold War
- escalation of the Vietnam conflict
- the Civil Rights movement
- Soviet advances in space technology
- unresolved issues from World War II
Bills, Scott L, ed. Kent State/May 4: Echoes through a Decade. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 1988.
“Kent State Shootings: May 4th Collection.” https://www.library.kent.edu/special-collections-and-archives/kent-state-shootings-may-4-collection
Scranton, William. The Report of the President’s Commission on Campus Unrest. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1970. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED083899.pdf
Bates, Tom. Rads: The 1970 Bombing of the Army Math Research Center at the University of Wisconsin and its Aftermath. New York: HarperCollins, 1992.
Eszterhas, Joe, and Michael D. Roberts. Thirteen Seconds: Confrontation at Kent State. Cleveland, OH: Gray and Company, 2015.
Flamm, Michael. Law and Order: Street Crime, Civil Unrest, and the Crisis of Liberalism in the 1960s. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.
Grace, Thomas M. Kent State: Death and Dissent in the Long Sixties. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 2016.
Heineman, Kenneth J. Campus Wars: The Peace Movement at American State Universities in the Vietnam Era. New York: New York University Press, 1993.
Rudd, Mark.Underground: My Life with SDS and the Weathermen. New York: William Morrow, 2010.
Sale, Kirkpatrick. SDS. New York: Vintage, 1974.
Small, Melvin, and William D. Hoover, eds. Give Peace a Chance: Exploring the Vietnam Antiwar Movement. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1992.
Viorst, Milton. Fire in the Streets: America in the 1960s. New York: Touchstone, 1981.
Zaroulis, Nancy, and Gerald Sullivan. Who Spoke Up? American Protest against the War in Vietnam, 1963-1975. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1985.