Scaffolded Primary Source: Madison’s Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention, 1787
A scaffolded version of Madison's notes detailing the representation debate at the Constitutional Convention.
Primary Source: Madison‚ Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention, 1787
Objectives:
- I can explain the debate regarding representation in the legislative branch at the Constitutional Convention.
- I can assess how the Constitution reflects compromise on the issue.
- I can create an argument using primary sources.
Building Context:
James Madison’s “Notes,” made during the debates at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787, show the diversity of opinion among the delegates as they worked to create a stronger national government than the one that existed under the Articles of Confederation. The following excerpts are taken from Madison’s notes on the
debates on representation, specifically who should elect representatives to Congress. For each of the following entries, summarize the speaker’s view on representation.
Speaker |
Text |
Annotations |
Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, South |
“Moved that the 1st branch, |
Pinckney wanted state
|
George Mason, Virginia |
Argued the necessity of retaining the election by the people. Whatever inconveniency may attend the democratic principle, it must actuate one part of the Government. It is the only |
Mason is urging a representative popular government for the rights of the people, however messy the character of that government. |
John Rutledge, South Carolina |
An election by the Legislature would be more refined (moderate, less passionate) than an election immediately by the people: and would be more likely to correspond with the sense of the whole community. |
Rutledge is supporting the representation principle through the legislature to refine and enlarge, and to filter popular views, instead of a direct vote like Mason supports. |
James Wilson, Pennsylvania |
Considered the election of the 1st |
Wilson joins Mason in seeing direct election by the people as the foundation of republican self-government. This, he believes, is the real basis for representation, not indirect election. |
Roger Sherman, Connecticut |
I oppose the election [of the House |
Sherman wants to continue equality in Congress by state as under the Articles, but also fears that the people’s passions may cause them to be led astray by a demagogic leader. |
Elbridge Gerry, Massachusetts |
The evils we experience flow from the excess of democracy. The people do not lack virtue, but |
Gerry supports the idea of representation and the virtue of the people, but again, democracy as opposed to republican institutions that filters views can open the path to demagoguery as with the recent Shays’ Rebellion. |
Final text in the U.S. Constitution: Article 1, Section 2 The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States. Article 1, Section 3 The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, chosen by the Legislature thereof, for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote. |
Comprehension and Analysis Questions:
- Explain the two major arguments for representation captured in these views.
- How does the final text of the ratified Constitution show that compromise was reached among the delegates?
- How does the final text of the ratified Constitution attempt to balance the need for a government based on the people that still moderates or refines their wishes?