Lesson · Point-Counterpoint
Point Counterpoint: Federalists v. Anti-Federalists Claims
Guiding question
How can opposing viewpoints be critically evaluated to inform understanding?
Virtues
Objectives
- I can summarize, compare, and evaluate two claims.
Directions: Complete the graphic organizer as you read the point and counterpoint essays.
|
Point |
The Issue on the Table |
Counterpoint |
|
Summarize in your own words:
Select and record the sentence(s) that best demonstrate the point of view of this claim: |
Summarize in your own words:
Select and record the sentence(s) that best demonstrate the point of view of this claim: |
Lesson Components
Critically analyze two opposing claims on a given topic by summarizing their core arguments, comparing their key points of divergence, and evaluating their strengths and weaknesses.
Were the Federalists or Anti-Federalists more convincing?
Were the Federalists or Anti-Federalists more convincing?
Scholarly Claim Essays + Student Activity
Were the Federalists or Anti-Federalists more convincing?
Were the Federalists or Anti-Federalists more convincing?
Critically analyze two opposing claims on a given topic by summarizing their core arguments, comparing their key points of divergence, and evaluating their strengths and weaknesses.
Lesson plan
- Compare the two arguments. To what extent do these claims support or oppose each other?
- Which argument do you find more convincing? Explain what led you to this point of view.
- What questions are you left with, or what other relevant details could you add to either claim?
Standards
Related materials
A prognostication opinion game that surfaces the dynamic between The Federalists, who drafted the Constitution as the highest law of the land, and the Anti-Federalists who wanted to ensure that the people had an individual Bill of Rights.