Skip to Main Content

Lesson

Due Process and Fair Trials

Duration
240 min
Published
Nov 5, 2020
Interior view of a historic courtroom with wooden benches, ornate lighting, and decorative windows.
Does the Supreme Court still have a responsibility to abide by fair trials, due process, and the Constitution during wartime? Evaluate the contradictory viewpoints concerning liberty and security.

Founding Principles

Liberty, Due Process

Learning objectives

  • Students evaluate contradictory viewpoints concerning liberty and security.
  • Students evaluate Supreme Court decisions regarding fair trial, due process, and the war on terror.
  • Students analyze components of a fair trial.
  • Students evaluate whether the Constitution takes on different meanings during wartime.

Materials

  • Handout A: Constitutional Provisions Related to Due Process and Fair Trial
  • Handout B: Background Essay—Due Process and Military Justice
  • Handout C: Glossary
  • Handout D: Case # 1— Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004) Background and Facts
  • Handout E: Case # 2— Rasul v. Bush (2004) Background and Facts
  • Handout F: Case # 3— Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006) Background and Facts
  • Handout G: Case # 4— Boumediene v. Bush (2008) Background and Facts
  • Handout H: Case # 1— Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004) Supreme Court Decision
  • Handout I: Case # 2— Rasul v. Bush (2004) Supreme Court Decision
  • Handout J: Case # 3— Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006) Supreme Court Decision
  • Handout K: Case # 4— Boumediene v. Bush (2008) Supreme Court Decision
  • Handout L: Case # 5— U.S. v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, et al. Military Commission Proceedings 2011-2015
  • Handout M: Timeline— Military Justice during the War on Terror
  • Handout N: Comparing Supreme Court Decisions

Lesson Components

Load more
Sign in as an educator to view teacher materialsSign in →

Lesson plan

240 minClick a phase to open it

Standards