Graphic Organizer: Gerrymandering, Representation, and Consent of the Governed
Graphic Organizer: Gerrymandering, Representation, and Consent of the Governed
Directions: Fill in the tables below about the two Supreme Court cases then answer the follow-up question.
Baker v. Carr (1962) | |
Summary of case | |
Court decision | |
Main ideas from majority opinion | |
Main ideas from dissenting opinion | |
Case connections to representation and consent of the governed
|
|
Do you agree with the Court’s decision in this case? Why or why not?
|
|
What questions do you still have about this case? |
Shaw v. Reno (1993) | |
Summary of case | |
Court decision | |
Main ideas from majority opinion | |
Main ideas from dissenting opinion | |
Case connections to representation and consent of the governed
|
|
Do you agree with the Court’s decision in this case? Why or why not?
|
|
What questions do you still have about this case? |
After completing the tables above, answer the following question:
Based on the sources you read, what is the relationship between gerrymandering, the concept of representation, and the principle of consent of the governed?