U.S. Supreme Court, Dred Scott v. Sandford 60 US 393, 1856
Get the Scaffolded Version
How did the principles of the Declaration of Independence contribute to the quest to end slavery from colonial times to the outbreak of the Civil War?
- I can interpret primary sources related to Founding principles of liberty, equality, and justice from the colonial era to the outbreak of the Civil War.
- I can explain how laws and policy, courts, and individuals and groups contributed to or pushed back against the quest to end slavery.
- I can create an argument using evidence from primary sources.
- I can analyze issues in history to help find solutions to present-day challenges.
The Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) case was brought to the Supreme Court just 4 years before the start of the Civil War. Dred Scott was an enslaved man in Missouri who moved with his master to the free state of Illinois and the free federal territory of Wisconsin. Upon moving back to Missouri, Scott sued his master for his freedom, claiming that he became free when they moved to the northern free state and territory. The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case because the justices hoped it would settle political tensions over slavery. Their 7-2 ruling established two things: first, African Americans were not citizens and had no right to sue in court; and second, Congress did not have the constitutional authority to ban slavery from the territories. The opinion of the court was written by Chief Justice Roger Taney, a southern supporter. Like John C. Calhoun and other southern defenders of slavery, Taney read the Declaration of Independence as an affirmation of the natural rights of whites only, rather than a universal statement of the inherent rights of all humans.
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856)
It is difficult at this day to realize the state of public opinion in relation to that unfortunate race which prevailed in the civilized and enlightened portions of the world at the time of the Declaration of Independence and when the Constitution of the United States was framed and adopted. But the public history of every European nation displays it in a manner too plain to be mistaken. They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race either in social or political relations, and so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect, and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. 
Comprehension and Analysis Questions
- How is Taney’s perspective sympathetic to the ideas put forth by those who believed that slavery was a “positive good?” Consider the writings of John C. Calhoun and George Fitzhugh.
- How was the ruling in the Dred Scott case at odds with Founding principles of liberty, equality, and justice?