- How can a person become so deceived by an idea that they will commit horrific acts against others?
- How can one prevent themselves from being deceived in such a way?
- Students will analyze a variety of primary sources to understand aspects of the Holocaust.
- Students will understand how ordinary men and women can succumb to self-deception and commit atrocities.
- Irma Grese and Deception: Analyzing Primary Source Documents
- The Self-Deception of Irma Grese Essay
- Discussion Guide – The Self-Deception of Irma Grese
- Photo Comparison with Critical Thinking Questions
- Virtue in Action – The Self-Deception of Irma Grese
- Self-Deception Worksheet Writing Prompt
- Nazi ideology
- moral culpability
- civic duty vs civic virtue
- collective action
Bergen, Doris L. War & Genocide: A Concise History of the Holocaust. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003.
Browning, Christopher R. Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. New York: Harper Collins, 1992.
Gellately, Robert. Backing Hitler: Consent and Coercion in Nazi Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Johnson, Eric. Nazi Terror: The Gestapo, Jews, and Ordinary Germans. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
Wistrich, Robert S. Hitler and the Holocaust. New York: Modern Library, 2001.
Students will need some background in the context of WWII, Hitler’s rule, and Nazi objectives and policies toward Jewish people.
Provide students with the Irma Grese and Deception: Analyzing Primary Source Documents handout and use the Who, What, When, Where, Why, How method to talk students through analysis of the excerpt from BBC correspondent Patrick Gordon-Walker concerning his experience at Belsen Concentration Camp.
Ask: Why are such primary sources important in understanding historical events?
In class, have students work in pairs or trios to talk through the Discussion Guide questions. Instruct them to select what they consider the 3 most important questions for whole-class discussion.
After small group work, take a quick poll of the class to identify what they think are the most important questions, and then lead students to consider those questions in whole-class discussion.
Provide students with the Photo Comparison worksheet.
In small groups have students examine Photo 1 and discuss the questions on the same page.
Then instruct them to examine Photo 2 and discuss its questions.
Finally, in whole-class discussion, consider the Critical Thinking Questions accompanying the third photograph:
- How does this photo impact your view of the three girls from before? Do you think the girls in the first photo are capable of such atrocities?
- How do you think it was that ordinary individuals became involved in such barbaric actions?
- Though Irma Grese is not one of the girls pictured, she was a part of the same League of German Women. How does knowing Irma’s story affect how you view the girls?
Provide students with the Self-Deception Worksheet writing prompt and have them write their answer for a personal application of questions regarding how can a person become so deceived by an idea that they will commit horrific acts against others, and how such deception can be prevented?
Have students complete the Virtue in Action activity.
August Landmesser’s Courageous Refusal
This lesson provides a look at the virtue of courage through the courageous action of August Landmesser. Courage is defined as standing firm in being a person of character and doing what is right, especially when it is unpopular or puts you at risk. This lesson explores the significance of courage in a society built on democratic principles.
John Brown and Self-Deception
Students will explore the vice of self-deception in this lesson on civic virtue. Students will examine whether John Brown deceived himself with self-righteousness by thinking that he could end slavery in the antebellum United States by freeing and arming slaves to launch a racial war in the South. Students will analyze a historical narrative, discussion guide, primary sources, and other activities to decide whether it is acceptable to break the law based upon one's view of a higher law.