David Blight: “Could the War have been Prevented?” http://voices.washingtonpost.com/house-divided/2010/11/david_blight_could_the_war_hav.html
Finkleman, Paul. Dred Scott v. Sandford: A Brief History with Documents. Boston: Bedford Books, 1997.
Fehrenbacher, Don E. The Dred Scott Case: Its Significance in American Law and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Lincoln, Abraham, “The Dred Scott Decision: Speech at Springfield, Illinois, June 26, 1857,” in, Roy P. Basler, ed. Abraham Lincoln: His Speeches and Writings. Cambridge: Da Capo, 2001.
Maltz, Earl M. Dred Scott and the Politics of Slavery. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2007.
Newmyer, R. Kent. The Supreme Court under Marshall and Taney. Arlington Heights, IL: Harlan Davidson,
Potter, David M. The Impending Crisis, 1848-1861. New York: Harper, 2011.
Simon, James F. Lincoln and Chief Justice Taney: Slavery, Secession, and the President’s War Powers. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2006.
CENTRAL QUESTION: Can good intentions result in a bad consequence?
There are times when we want to help someone solve a problem. We might be guided by the best of intentions, but things sometimes do not go as planned or lead to unintended consequences.
- Ask the students to respond to the following journal prompt, Was there ever a time in your life when you had good intentions to solve a problem but things did not turn out as planned?
- After giving them some time to reflect and write, ask students to volunteer to share their experience. Follow up with:
- Were your intentions good or self-serving?
- Did you not have enough information to offer advice?
- Were you intervening in a problem you were ill-equipped to solve?
- Were you too arrogant in thinking you could have solved the problem?
- Should you have just have not gotten involved?
- Why did bad consequences result from your intervention despite your good intention?
- Explain that many important leaders in politics, the military, business, or local communities have made decisions that had good intentions but bad consequences. Ask, How can I avoid this situation in the future with a greater sense of the virtue of humility?
This optional introductory activity is designed to support you in the classroom. However, the primary narratives and photos in the section that follows can be used with or without this introduction.
Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857)
Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. Sanford. This case deals with the issues of slavery, states’ rights, and the interpretation of our Founding documents. This lesson focuses on the question of how the two sides in the Dred Scott decision interpreted the same Founding documents and came to such different conclusions.
Dred Scott v. Sandford | Homework Help from the Bill of Rights Institute
The Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857 was brought to the Supreme Court just four years before the start of the Civil War. Dred Scott sued his master for his freedom and Judge Robert Taney ultimately ruled two things. First, African Americans were not citizens and had no right to sue in court. Second, Congress did not have the constitutional authority to ban slavery from the states. This case is considered one of the worst rulings in the history of the Supreme Court.