Bill of Rights Institute

  • ENGAGE for students
    • Student Programs & Events
      • Spring Programs
      • Summer Programs
      • Fall Programs
    • Student Resources
      • Think the Vote
      • Homework Help
      • APUSH
      • Debate Webinars
      • AP Prep Webinars
    • Primary Sources
    • Constitutional Academy
    • We The Students Essay Competition
  • EDUCATE for teachers
    • Educator Programs & Events
      • Spring Programs
      • Summer Programs
      • Fall Programs
      • Educator Webinars
    • Educator Resources
      • Documents of Freedom
      • Voices of History
      • Current Events & eLessons
      • Primary Sources
      • Book Recommendations
    • Constitution Day 2018
    • Resources for Students
      • Think the Vote
      • Homework Help
      • APUSH
    • Update Your BRI Profile
  • EMPOWER for supporters
    • Parent Resources
    • Donate
      • Donate Now
      • Donate FAQ
    • Ways to Give
      • In-Kind Donations
      • Legacy
      • Stock Transfers
    • Become a Sustaining Member
    • Investor Corporations & Foundations
  • Donate
Sign In / Register

Supreme Court’s Wine-Regulation Case Focuses On Protectionism

Home / Educate / Educator Resources / Teaching with Current Events / Federalism / Supreme Court’s Wine-Regulation Case Focuses On Protectionism
  • All Topics
  • Citizen Juries
  • Criminal Procedure & Due Process
  • Debates and Conversations
  • Federalism
  • Freedom of Assembly
  • Freedom of Religion
  • Freedom of Speech
  • Freedom of the Press
  • Gun Rights
  • Individual Liberties
  • Property Rights
  • Separation of Powers
  • Student Rights

Supreme Court’s Wine-Regulation Case Focuses On Protectionism

Mega-retailer Total Wine & More made its case against Tennessee retail associations and laws as it desires to open stores within the state. Tennessee currently has a residency requirement for operators owning retail stores that mandate that they have lived in the state for at least 10 years.

Total’s attorneys challenged that notion, along with attorneys for Mary and Doug Ketchum, who moved to Tennessee as they were told the weather would be better for their mentally disabled child…

Read Full Article >>

Related BRI Resources

  • Federalism
  • What is a Federal Republic?
  • Gibbons v. Ogden
  • James Madison and Federal Power

https://billofrightsinstitute.org/events/supreme-courts-wine-regulation-case-focuses-on-protectionism/

1310 North Courthouse Rd. #620 Arlington, VA 22201

703.894.1776

info@billofrightsinstitute.org

© 2019 Bill of Rights Institute

PRIVACY POLICY

  • About Us
  • Statement of Academic Integrity
  • Join Our Team
  • Request Professional Development

Connect with BRI