<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bill of Rights Institute &#187; John Marshall Harlan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/tag/john-marshall-harlan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billofrightsinstitute.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:06:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tinker v. Des Moines DBQ Continues! &#8211; Document 10</title>
		<link>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/08/04/tinker-v-des-moines-dbq-continues-document-10/</link>
		<comments>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/08/04/tinker-v-des-moines-dbq-continues-document-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 12:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maria santos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A More Perfect Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBQs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[document based question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Marshall Harlan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landmark supreme court cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Beth Tinker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[students and the supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court DBQs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tinker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tinker v. des moines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billofrightsinstitute.org/?p=1674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you use document-based questions in your classroom? This summer the Bill of Rights Institute is blogging a document-based question on the Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines (1969). Each weekly post will feature an excerpted document related to the case, along with some questions to guide your thinking on it. Each document should&#160;<a class="readMore" href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/08/04/tinker-v-des-moines-dbq-continues-document-10/">Read more...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Do you use document-based questions in your classroom?</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px;" src="http://www.visualthesaurus.com/cm/lessons/2292/scotus.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" /></p>
<p>This summer the Bill of Rights Institute is blogging a document-based question on the Supreme Court case <a href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/resources/educator-resources/lessons-plans/landmark-cases-and-the-constitution/tinker-v-des-moines-1969/"><em>Tinker v. Des Moines</em> (1969)</a>. Each weekly post will feature an excerpted document related to the case, along with some questions to guide your thinking on it. Each document should be used to address the question: <strong>“Evaluate the extent to which the <a href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/resources/educator-resources/americapedia/americapedia-bill-of-rights/first-amendment/">First Amendment</a> should protect symbolic speech, and the degree to which that protection should be guaranteed to students in public school.”</strong></p>
<p>Check out our previous posts for a <a href="billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/06/02/dbq/">case background and document #1</a>, <a href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/06/09/tinker-v-des-moines-dbq-document-2/">document #2</a>, <em>West Virginia v. Barnette</em>, <a href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/06/16/tinker-v-des-moines-dbq-document-3/">document #3</a>, a picture of Vietnam War protestors outside the White House, <a href="billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/06/23/tinker-v-des-moines-dbq-document-4/">document #4</a>, a collection of “Hate Mail” received by the Tinker Family, <a href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/06/30/tinker-v-des-moines-dbq-document-5/">document #5</a> and <a href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/07/08/tinker-v-des-moines-dbq-document-6/">document #6</a>, parts of the Oral Arguments for the case, <a href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/07/14/tinker-v-des-moines-dbq-document-7/">document #7</a>, the Majority Opinion, <a href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/07/22/document-8-tinker-v-des-moines/">document #8</a>, the Concurring Opinion, and <a href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/07/28/tinker-v-des-moines-dbq-document-9-2/">document #9</a><em>.</em><em></em></p>
<p><strong>Today&#8217;s document is the Dissenting Opinion (John Marshall Harlan), Tinker v. Des Moines, 1969.</strong></p>
<p>[S]chool officials should be accorded the widest authority in maintaining discipline and good order in their institutions. To translate that proposition into a workable constitutional rule, I would, in cases like this, cast upon those complaining the burden of showing that a particular school measure was motivated by other than legitimate school concerns—for example, a desire to prohibit the expression of an unpopular point of view, while permitting expression of the dominant opinion.</p>
<p><strong>Think about it: </strong></p>
<p>What action by public school officials does Harlan assert would<br />
violate the First Amendment rights of students?</p>
<p>How does this impact your answer to the DBQ question: <strong>“Evaluate the extent to which the <a href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/resources/educator-resources/americapedia/americapedia-bill-of-rights/first-amendment/">First Amendmen</a>t should protect symbolic speech, and the degree to which that protection should be guaranteed to students in public school”</strong>?</p>
<p><strong>_____________________________________________________________________<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Check back each week to see the next document and how it might change your thinking on this important question that affects all public school teachers and students in the U.S.!</p>
<p>If you are enjoying this DBQ – be sure to check out our curriculum <a href="http://store.billofrightsinstitute.org/Supreme-Court-DBQs-p/1480-06.htm" target="_self">Supreme Court DBQs: Exploring the Cases the Changed History</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/08/04/tinker-v-des-moines-dbq-continues-document-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
