<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bill of Rights Institute &#187; Constitution Courier eLesson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/category/constitution-courier-elesson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billofrightsinstitute.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:26:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter and Student Free Speech</title>
		<link>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/12/02/twitterandstudentfreespeech/</link>
		<comments>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/12/02/twitterandstudentfreespeech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>veronica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution Courier eLesson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teaching the Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaching the Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billofrightsinstitute.org/?p=2153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An 18-year old Kansas high school senior attended a field trip with her Youth in Government program. On her way back from the event, she posted a tweet disparaging of Governor Sam Brownback and containing off-color language to her 65 followers. The governor’s staff noticed the tweet in the course of their regular monitoring of&#160;<a class="readMore" href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/12/02/twitterandstudentfreespeech/">Read more...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-2158" href="http://blog.billofrightsinstitute.org/2011/12/twitterandstudentfreespeech/bill_of_rights_pg1of1_ac/"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2158" style="border: 4px solid white" src="http://blog.billofrightsinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Bill_of_Rights_Pg1of1_AC.jpg" alt="" width="280" height="293" /></a>An 18-year old Kansas high school senior attended a field trip with her Youth in Government program. On her way back from the event, she posted a tweet disparaging of Governor Sam Brownback and containing off-color language to her 65 followers. The governor’s staff noticed the tweet in the course of their regular monitoring of social media, and contacted the Youth in Government program. The student’s principal told her she would have to write a letter of apology to the governor; she refused. (Shawnee Mission School District later said she would not be required to write an apology.) The governor’s office later apologized for overreacting. This eLesson explores the First Amendment implications of these events.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://my.billofrightsinstitute.org/page.aspx?pid=1271&amp;srctid=1&amp;erid=2312020&amp;trid=22741e79-16df-4f59-8362-466a8a820006">Explore the impact of the First Amendment in this eLesson</a>!<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Did you use this eLesson in your classroom to discuss First Amendment rights?  How did your students react to the story?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/12/02/twitterandstudentfreespeech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When should Supreme Court Justices recuse themselves from a case?</title>
		<link>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/10/19/when-should-supreme-court-justices-recuse-themselves-from-a-case/</link>
		<comments>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/10/19/when-should-supreme-court-justices-recuse-themselves-from-a-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rgillespie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A More Perfect Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution Courier eLesson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sidebar Nav Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Health Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recusal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seperation of powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billofrightsinstitute.org/?p=1805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not many people realize what an innovative concept an independent judiciary was when the Constitution was ratified in 1789. In the United States, judges would not be dependent on the executive; there would truly be three distinct branches of power. Supreme Court Justices would serve for life during good behavior, in part to ensure their&#160;<a class="readMore" href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/10/19/when-should-supreme-court-justices-recuse-themselves-from-a-case/">Read more...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="border: 4px solid white;" src="http://pix.alaporte.net/pub/d/24240-1/Supreme+Court+-+Sunset.JPG" alt="" width="302" height="201" />Not many people realize what an innovative concept an <a href="http://my.billofrightsinstitute.org/page.aspx?pid=999" target="_self">independent judiciary</a> was when the <a href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/page.aspx?pid=462" target="_self">Constitution</a> was ratified in 1789. In the United States, judges would not be dependent on the executive; there would truly be <a href="https://my.billofrightsinstitute.org/sslpage.aspx?pid=1073" target="_self">three distinct branches of power</a>.</p>
<p>Supreme Court Justices would serve for life during good behavior, in part to ensure their decisions were not subject to changing political winds. But because a judge&#8217;s responsibility is to impartially uphold the Constitution, federal law requires them to decline to take part in cases in which they may be unable to be impartial. This is known as recusal.</p>
<p>There have been calls for <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/about/members.aspx" target="_blank">two sitting Justices</a> &#8212; <a href="http://www.oyez.org/justices/clarence_thomas" target="_blank">Clarence Thomas</a> and <a href="http://www.oyez.org/justices/elena_kagan" target="_blank">Elena Kagan</a> &#8212; to recuse themselves from deciding the constitutionality of the <a href="https://my.billofrightsinstitute.org/sslpage.aspx?pid=627" target="_self">Affordable Health Care Act</a> for claimed conflicts of interest. (Though the Affordable Health Care Act is not officially on the Supreme Court&#8217;s docket yet, the Court is widely expected to take it up.)<br />
<a href="http://my.billofrightsinstitute.org/page.aspx?pid=1247&amp;srctid=1&amp;erid=2204845&amp;trid=b49c1afa-179f-41cc-b47c-fc0a85d03092" target="_self"><br />
Explore the constitutional role of an independent judiciary</a>, the federal law requiring their recusal in certain situations, and the calls for the two Justices to step aside.</p>
<p><strong>What strategies did you use to engage your students with this lesson? What, if any, barriers did you face? </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/10/19/when-should-supreme-court-justices-recuse-themselves-from-a-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teaching about the death of Osama bin Laden</title>
		<link>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/05/09/teaching-about-the-death-of-osama-bin-laden/</link>
		<comments>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/05/09/teaching-about-the-death-of-osama-bin-laden/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 11:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>veronica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution Courier eLesson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commander in chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule of law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separation of powers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billofrightsinstitute.org/?p=1169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost immediately after President Obama announced that the U.S. had killed September 11 mastermind and Al-Qaida head Osama bin Laden, teachers knew it would be a topic of conversation the next day in school and for months and years to come. We work to prepare curriculum resources that tie constitutional principles to current events in ways&#160;<a class="readMore" href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/05/09/teaching-about-the-death-of-osama-bin-laden/">Read more...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-1176" href="http://blog.billofrightsinstitute.org/2011/05/teaching-about-the-death-of-osama-bin-laden/obama-announces-bin-laden-dead-2/"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1176" src="http://blog.billofrightsinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Obama-announces-bin-Laden-dead1-120x150.png" alt="" width="120" height="150" /></a>Almost immediately after President Obama announced that the U.S. had killed September 11 mastermind and Al-Qaida head Osama bin Laden, teachers knew it would be a topic of conversation the next day in school and for months and years to come.</p>
<p>We work to prepare <a href="http://www.billofrightsinstitute.org/page.aspx?pid=708">curriculum resources </a>that tie constitutional principles to <a href="http://www.billofrightsinstitute.org/page.aspx?pid=468">current events </a>in ways that show young people why their rights matter, why the Constitution matters, and why our constitutional principles continue to be important.</p>
<p>This week’s expanded <a href="http://www.billofrightsinstitute.org/page.aspx?pid=461">eLesson </a>provides current events resources along with critical thinking questions to guide discussion of the death of Osama bin Laden in the context of American history and traditions, the <a href="http://www.billofrightsinstitute.org/page.aspx?pid=462">Constitution</a>, and the rule of law.</p>
<p>The lesson provides links to news stories and constitutional resources, along with critical thinking questions, to help students answer the question:</p>
<blockquote><p><em><strong>“The Constitution divides war-making power between the executive and legislative branches, ensuring that war would not be the result of a King’s personal pride or quest for power. If you were the President of the United States during the time of the September 11 attacks, how would you have sought to balance citizens’ natural desire for arbitrary power with respect for the rule of law?”</strong></em></p></blockquote>
<p>The resource will be sent to our eLesson subscribers, and is available here for free download. We hope you will be able to review it and decide how you can use it with your students. If you do, please tell us in the comments how it went. What is the most important lesson for students to take away from this historical event? Download the lesson: <a rel="attachment wp-att-1193" href="http://blog.billofrightsinstitute.org/2011/05/teaching-about-the-death-of-osama-bin-laden/constitutional-principles-and-the-death-of-osama-bin-laden/">Constitutional Principles and the Death of Osama bin Laden</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/05/09/teaching-about-the-death-of-osama-bin-laden/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Healthcare Act, Federalism, and the Commerce Clause</title>
		<link>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/02/10/the-healthcare-act-federalism/</link>
		<comments>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/02/10/the-healthcare-act-federalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rgillespie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution Courier eLesson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billofrightsinstitute.org/?p=697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tension between state and federal power has increased with the recent U.S. District Court ruling that the entire Affordable Healthcare Act is unconstitutional. While two courts have upheld the Act&#8217;s constitutionality, this ruling highlights important questions regarding what the national government is and is not permitted to do. Have your students been discussing the controversy?&#160;<a class="readMore" href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/02/10/the-healthcare-act-federalism/">Read more...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-678" href="http://blog.billofrightsinstitute.org/2011/02/news-on-the-healthcare-law/newspaper-and-computer/"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-678" src="http://blog.billofrightsinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Newspaper-and-Computer-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="210" height="158" /></a></p>
<p>Tension between state and federal power has increased with the recent U.S. District Court<strong> </strong>ruling  that the entire Affordable Healthcare Act is unconstitutional. While  two courts have upheld the Act&#8217;s constitutionality, this ruling  highlights important questions regarding what the national government is  and is not permitted to do. Have your students been discussing the  controversy? Guide their discussion about the constitutional principles  at play with this week&#8217;s Bill of Rights in the News eLesson on <a href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/page.aspx?pid=737" target="_blank">Healthcare, Federalism, and the Commerce Clause</a>.</p>
<p>Try these strategies to help your students connect with the issues:</p>
<p>- Explore the idea of Federalism with your class in our <a href="http://www.constitutionbee.org/user/StudentGuide.aspx?id=836">Student Study Guide</a>, <a href="http://www.billofrightsinstitute.org/page.aspx?pid=538">Daily News Headlines</a>, and <a href="http://www.billofrightsinstitute.org/page.aspx?pid=485">Landmark Supreme Court Case</a> listing.</p>
<p>- Did your state join the suit? Have students research whether their  state joined the suit, and ask them if they agree or disagree with the  position of their legislators.</p>
<p>- Join the conversation! Encourage students to comment on our <a href="../2011/02/news-on-the-healthcare-law/">blog post about the Healthcare Act news</a> or on local news articles and voice their opinions about whether the individual mandate is constitutional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/02/10/the-healthcare-act-federalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can the man behind WikiLeaks be charged with violating the Espionage Act?</title>
		<link>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2010/12/07/can-wikileaks-be-charged-with-espionage/</link>
		<comments>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2010/12/07/can-wikileaks-be-charged-with-espionage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rgillespie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution Courier eLesson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[espionage act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protecting privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should the U.S. be &#8220;scared of one guy with a laptop&#8221;? WikiLeaks&#8217;s release of thousands of classified U.S. diplomatic cables has frustrated governments around the world, including the U.S. The Justice Department is determining whether Australian citizen Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, along with whoever gave him the secret documents, can be charged under the&#160;<a class="readMore" href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2010/12/07/can-wikileaks-be-charged-with-espionage/">Read more...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/World/terrorism-security/2010/1130/Did-WikiLeaks-founder-Julian-Assange-commit-a-crime"><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 6px" src="http://www.csmonitor.com/var/ezflow_site/storage/images/media/images/1130-odu-julian-assange-wikileaks/9102867-1-eng-US/1130-ODU-Julian-Assange-wikileaks_full_600.jpg" alt="Photo by Valentin Flauraud, Reuters" width="202" height="134" /></a>Should the U.S. be &#8220;scared of one guy with a laptop&#8221;? WikiLeaks&#8217;s  release of thousands of classified U.S. diplomatic cables has frustrated  governments around the world, including the U.S. The Justice Department  is determining whether Australian citizen Julian Assange, founder of  WikiLeaks, along with whoever gave him the secret documents, can be  charged under the Espionage Act.</p>
<p>The situation raises questions of press freedom in wartime and how  technology has challenged the power of governments to keep information  secret. Use  these strategies to help your students understand the issues raised by the  <a href="../../Teach/freeResources/Lessons/?action=showDetails&amp;id=312&amp;ref=showCatD&amp;catId=6">WikiLeaks case</a>:</p>
<p>- Have students compare and contrast the facts of the <a href="http://www.constitutionbee.org/user/StudentGuide.aspx?id=712">Pentagon Papers case (<em>New York Times v. U.S.</em>)</a> with the current WikiLeaks publication of secret documents.</p>
<p>- Play this <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2010/11/30/131690619/wikileaks-assange-may-be-talking-himself-into-espionage-act-charges">conversation between Assange and a U.S. journalist</a>, and have students vote in  the accompanying poll about whether he violated the Espionage Act.</p>
<p>- Hold a mock trial presenting arguments on the question of whether Assange violated the Espionage Act.</p>
<p>If you are looking for additional materials, our <a href="https://my.billofrightsinstitute.org/NetCommunity/SSLPage.aspx?pid=262&amp;nccsm=21&amp;__nccspID=873" target="_blank"><em>Presidents and the Constitution</em>, Volume I</a> curriculum has a great lesson on President Wilson and the Espionage Act.</p>
<p><strong>P.S.</strong> <em>Thank you for your feedback</em>! This week we created a separate <a href="http://www.billofrightsinstitute.org/Teach/freeresources/newsletters/BRN/2010-2011/Wikileaks-Student-Handout.pdf">Student Handout PDF</a> (share it online with your students: <a href="http://bit.ly/WikiLeaksForStudents" target="_blank">http://bit.ly/WikiLeaksForStudents</a>) and <a href="http://www.billofrightsinstitute.org/Teach/freeresources/newsletters/BRN/2010-2011/Wikileaks-Answer-Key.pdf">Teacher Answer Key</a> for this lesson after hearing your comments from our web survey. Please <a href="http://www.facebook.com/BillofRightsInstitute">let us know</a> what else we can improve!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2010/12/07/can-wikileaks-be-charged-with-espionage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do full body airport scans violate your Fourth Amendment rights?</title>
		<link>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2010/11/17/do-full-body-airport-scans-violate/</link>
		<comments>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2010/11/17/do-full-body-airport-scans-violate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>veronica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution Courier eLesson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal liberty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will you be flying this holiday season? The new TSA security procedures including full body scans and enhanced pat downs have been in the news for their possible privacy implications. The Fourth Amendment protects &#8220;the right of the people to be secure in their persons…against unreasonable searches.&#8221; What constitutes an unreasonable search? Share this clip&#160;<a class="readMore" href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2010/11/17/do-full-body-airport-scans-violate/">Read more...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will you be flying this holiday season? The new TSA security procedures including full body scans and enhanced pat downs have been <a href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2010/10/personal-liberty-and-privacy/" target="_blank">in the news</a> for their possible privacy implications. The Fourth Amendment protects &#8220;the right of the people to be secure in their persons…against unreasonable searches.&#8221; What constitutes an unreasonable search?</p>
<p>Share this clip from the Today Show with students and ask them for their reactions:</p>
<p>What do you think? Try some of these strategies to discuss <a href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/Teach/freeResources/Lessons/?action=showDetails&amp;id=311&amp;ref=showCatD&amp;catId=11" target="_blank">airport security and the Fourth Amendment</a> with your students:</p>
<ol>
<li>Write the Fourth Amendment out on the board and brainstorm synonyms for &#8220;secure,&#8221; &#8220;unreasonable,&#8221; and &#8220;search&#8221;.</li>
<li>Have a fishbowl debate on the constitutionality of the searches.</li>
<li>The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation will hold a TSA oversight hearing Wednesday, November 17. Have students call or email their Senators expressing their opinions on the constitutionality of the new procedures. Students should write out bullet points of their key constitutional arguments to prepare.</li>
</ol>
<p>Is this <a href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/Teach/freeResources/Lessons/?action=showDetails&amp;id=311&amp;ref=showCatD&amp;catId=11" target="_blank">lesson</a> and <a href="http://www.billofrightsinstitute.org/Teach/freeresources/newsletters/CEC/2010-2011/AirportScannerLesson.pdf" target="_blank">fillable PDF</a> helpful to you? If so, please <a href="http://my.billofrightsinstitute.org/netcommunity/elesson" target="_blank">subscribe to our weekly Constitution Courier newsletters</a> to receive a free new classroom lesson in your inbox each week!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2010/11/17/do-full-body-airport-scans-violate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
