<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tinker v. Des Moines DBQ &#8211; Document 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/07/14/tinker-v-des-moines-dbq-document-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/07/14/tinker-v-des-moines-dbq-document-7/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:15:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill of Rights Institute: Tinker v. Des Moines DBQ – Document 13</title>
		<link>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/07/14/tinker-v-des-moines-dbq-document-7/#comment-4630</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill of Rights Institute: Tinker v. Des Moines DBQ – Document 13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 20:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billofrightsinstitute.org/?p=1536#comment-4630</guid>
		<description>[...] by the Tinker Family, document #5 and document #6, parts of the Oral Arguments for the case, document #7, the Majority Opinion, document #8, the Concurring Opinion, and document #9, the Dissenting Opinion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by the Tinker Family, document #5 and document #6, parts of the Oral Arguments for the case, document #7, the Majority Opinion, document #8, the Concurring Opinion, and document #9, the Dissenting Opinion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinker v. Des Moines DBQ Continues! &#8211; Document 10 &#124; A More Perfect Blog</title>
		<link>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/07/14/tinker-v-des-moines-dbq-document-7/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinker v. Des Moines DBQ Continues! &#8211; Document 10 &#124; A More Perfect Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 12:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billofrightsinstitute.org/?p=1536#comment-1079</guid>
		<description>[...] by the Tinker Family, document #5 and document #6, parts of the Oral Arguments for the case, document #7, the Majority Opinion, document #8, the Concurring Opinion, and document #9, the Dissenting Opinion (Hugo [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by the Tinker Family, document #5 and document #6, parts of the Oral Arguments for the case, document #7, the Majority Opinion, document #8, the Concurring Opinion, and document #9, the Dissenting Opinion (Hugo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinker v. Des Moines DBQ – Document 9 &#124; A More Perfect Blog</title>
		<link>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/07/14/tinker-v-des-moines-dbq-document-7/#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinker v. Des Moines DBQ – Document 9 &#124; A More Perfect Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billofrightsinstitute.org/?p=1536#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>[...] by the Tinker Family, document #5 and document #6, parts of the Oral Arguments for the case, document #7, the Majority Opinion, and document #8, the Concurring [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by the Tinker Family, document #5 and document #6, parts of the Oral Arguments for the case, document #7, the Majority Opinion, and document #8, the Concurring [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Document 8 &#8211; Tinker v. Des Moines &#124; A More Perfect Blog</title>
		<link>http://billofrightsinstitute.org/blog/2011/07/14/tinker-v-des-moines-dbq-document-7/#comment-1077</link>
		<dc:creator>Document 8 &#8211; Tinker v. Des Moines &#124; A More Perfect Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billofrightsinstitute.org/?p=1536#comment-1077</guid>
		<description>[...] Check out our previous posts for a case background and document #1, #2 West Virginia v. Barnette, #3 a picture of Vietnam War protestors outside the White House, #4 a collection of “Hate Mail” received by the Tinker Family, document #5 and document #6, parts of the Oral Arguments for the case, and document #7, the Majority Opinion. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check out our previous posts for a case background and document #1, #2 West Virginia v. Barnette, #3 a picture of Vietnam War protestors outside the White House, #4 a collection of “Hate Mail” received by the Tinker Family, document #5 and document #6, parts of the Oral Arguments for the case, and document #7, the Majority Opinion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
